Bengaluru 3: Ilya Ivashka vs Hamish Stewart

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Ilya Ivashka’s semifinal against Hamish Stewart in Bengaluru is priced by the crowd as a near-certain Ivashka result, with the market sitting at 100% YES and the bookmaker screen showing Ivashka around 1.11 to win outright. That leaves almost no room for an upset, so the consensus is firmly with the favourite and the only meaningful value angle is contrarian: Stewart only needs a clean first set or an interruption to create a path back into a market that is already fully loaded one way.

Recent comparable cases at this event have not been especially kind to longshots, and the ATP results page shows Ivashka is already through from a tight quarter-final win, beating his opponent 6-3 3-6 6-2 on Thursday. That kind of form generally supports the favourite, but it also means fatigue and court time are worth monitoring, especially in Challenger conditions where match length can matter more than raw ranking. Stewart’s best route is likely to lean on serve and short-set volatility rather than baseline consistency.

The main catalysts now are whether the match starts on schedule and whether there is any change in draw status, because the market’s 50-50 fallback only applies if the match is not played, ends level, or is delayed beyond seven days without a winner. Flashscore and ATP scoreboards should be watched for official start-time confirmation and any retirement or walkover scenario. If the match is completed normally, the current pricing suggests the market is already assuming Ivashka advances, so any value would have to come from an unexpected stoppage or a much closer contest than the odds imply.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reviews Bengaluru 3: Ilya Ivashka vs Hamish Stewart across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at PolyGram — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.