Bologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano - More Markets

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Bologna travel to the San Siro on 24 May for a Serie A fixture against Inter Milan, with the market currently pricing a "yes" outcome at 56 per cent implied probability. This settlement window closes just after the scheduled 9:00 AM ET kick-off, meaning the market reflects expectations around Inter's performance in what is typically a late-season Serie A encounter.

Inter have dominated the fixture in recent seasons, winning 11 of the last 15 meetings across all competitions. Bologna's home record against top-six sides has been mixed; they've secured draws against Juventus and Roma this season but lack the consistency to trouble Inter regularly. The 56 per cent probability suggests the market is pricing in Inter as slight favourites, though not by the margin their historical dominance might warrant. Bologna's defensive solidity—they've conceded fewer than one goal per game at home—creates a floor for their chances, but Inter's attacking depth and experience in high-stakes fixtures typically prevails.

Injury news and team selection announcements in the days before 24 May will be critical. Inter's availability of key attacking players, particularly their forward line, directly impacts their ability to break down Bologna's compact defence. Bologna's midfield fitness, especially any absences in their press-resistant setup, could shift the balance. Recent form matters less at this stage of the season than squad depth; Inter's ability to rotate whilst maintaining quality gives them structural advantage. The 56 per cent reading leaves room for contrarian positioning if either side reports significant personnel losses.

Methodology

This page reviews Bologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano - More Markets across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at PolyGram — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.