Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Marco Cecchinato vs Andrea Pellegrino

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Marco Cecchinato is due to meet Andrea Pellegrino in Roland Garros qualifying, and the market is currently pricing that at 0% YES, which points to a very strong consensus that the event will not settle in the normal way or that pricing has not yet populated. On tennis terms, Pellegrino looks the more plausible favourite on clay: the market notes his higher ranking, around 126, versus Cecchinato’s nearer 180, and recent-form models have leaned his way. Cecchinato, though, has already shown he can survive the opening rounds here, beating Max Houkes in straight sets in qualifying, so the baseline is not one-way traffic. In a normal two-player clay match, the stronger recent runner and higher-ranked player usually attracts the edge, but Roland Garros qualifying often produces tighter-than-expected contests where experience and surface fit can narrow the gap.

For traders, the key catalysts are basic but important: whether the fixture is confirmed for the expected slot, whether there is any court or schedule reshuffle at Paris, and whether either player withdraws before play. TennisMajors and the ATP live results page both list the tie as a coming qualifying-final, while Flashscore currently shows the pairing as a live/next-match listing, which suggests the market should watch for last-minute timing updates rather than assume a cancellation. The consensus appears to sit with Pellegrino on form and ranking, but the current 0% YES reading means the value question is less about the on-court favourite and more about whether the market has priced the event correctly at all before play begins.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.