Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Felix Gill vs Kyrian Jacquet

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Felix Gill meets Kyrian Jacquet in Roland Garros qualifying, with the market effectively pricing a full Jacquet win at 100% implied probability. That leaves no room for a contrary view, so the favourite case is already fully embedded and any value on the underdog depends on a clear misread of the draw, fitness or surface form rather than broad consensus. The same applies to scoreline-style expectations: when a market is this one-sided, the only meaningful edge usually comes from spotting an injury issue, a late withdrawal, or a mismatch in clay performance that has not yet reached the wider price.

The closest guide is recent clay qualifying data rather than headline ranking alone. Jacquet has been the steadier clay performer in 2026, and local conditions in Paris tend to reward that sort of match rhythm, which helps explain why consensus sits firmly with him. Gill’s case rests more on upset potential than on market expectation, so a contrarian angle is only attractive if his recent results suggest he can extend rallies and keep the match close on serve. Recent coverage from ATP and live-score services confirms the match was scheduled for 22 May and placed in the French Open qualifying programme, so traders should watch for order-of-play updates, any pre-match medical timeouts, and whether either player is moved on court later than expected, as that can alter retirement and cancellation risk before the settlement window closes on 29 May.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.