Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Who Will Win 2026) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | See live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | See live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | See live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | See live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | See live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas Set 2 Winner | 100% |
| Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas Match O/U 21.5 | 100% |
| Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas Match O/U 22.5 | 100% |
| Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas Match O/U 23.5 | 100% |
| Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas | 0% |
| Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 0% |
| Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas Set 1 Winner | 0% |
| Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 0% |
| Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
Market context
Andre Ilagan against Edas Butvilas is a tennis match with the market currently implying **0% YES**, which leaves the board treating Ilagan as a near-impossible outcome and, by implication, Butvilas as the clear favourite. That is a very hard line to justify on the tennis evidence alone: the pair have already played once in 2026, and Ilagan won that meeting in straight sets on hard court at Tyler[3][11]. Comparable head-to-head samples are thin, but when there is a live previous result and no strong injury or withdrawal signal, a zero-priced side is usually the one the market is most likely underestimating rather than the one it has perfectly assessed[3][5].
For a handicapper, the main question is whether this 0% reflects a real late development or just stale pricing around a low-profile Challenger fixture. The consensus from the available records is that Ilagan has the only head-to-head win and the cleaner recent matchup on this surface, while Butvilas still looks live if the market is reacting to general form rather than the specific pairing[3][4]. The value angle, if any, sits in contrarian support for Ilagan only if the match is confirmed to proceed and there is no adverse update on scheduling or player fitness; the bigger risk to any winner-market thesis is not an on-court upset but a cancellation, tie, or delay beyond seven days, which would send the contract to 50-50 under the market rules.
What traders need to watch is simple: official order-of-play confirmation, any last-minute court assignment change, and withdrawal or walkover news before first serve. The market description says the match was originally scheduled for 9 August at 2:00 PM ET, so a failure to start or complete it within the settlement window could matter more than the identity of the winner[2][3]. Live scoreboards and tennis databases already list the fixture, which suggests it has been on the schedule rather than abandoned outright, but in Challenger tennis the decisive catalyst is often a same-day update rather than pre-match chatter[2][7].
Methodology
This page reviews Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas across five venues. The live probability is the Polymarket mid-price, sourced directly from the on-chain Polygon order book; the comparison columns benchmark each venue on fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Who Will Win 2026, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Who Will Win 2026 trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Lexington: Andre Ilagan vs Edas Butvilas on Who Will Win 2026
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →